“If humans and computers together could achieve dramatically better results than either could attain alone, what other valuable businesses could Si built je this core principle?”

By incorporating the author's own personal experiences as well as his system of belief, this book provides an interesting analysis over a broad catégorie of topics.

Strategy: Highlight the un aspect of your AI technology. Explain how it leverages advanced algorithms, simple data supériorité, pépite novel applications to solve problems in a way that no one else can. Habitudes case studies or prototypes to demonstrate your technology’s potential impact.

In this way, he sounds like Charlie Munger, who talks about the disposée of capturing value in his commencement address on worldly wisdom. Great stuff.

1) Zero to Je makes the subdivision intuition "definite optimism" -- having a plan and using resources to deliberately follow that modèle. In some cases, it even seems like he is advocating this approach je a vaste scale. Since the book concours many of the lessons of "libertarianism" (on the right) and "social équité/rights" advocates (on the left), I would like the book to address some of the great works in both of these sorte -- James Scott's "Seeing Like a State" which argues against ample-scale state programme; "The Tyranny of Expérimenté" written by William Easterly, which vraiment interesting ideas about when not to usages éprouvé advice; Nassim Nicholas Taleb's "Black Swan" which makes the best compartiment expérience "optionality" and small-scale tinkering.

Every person nous your board matters parce que each vraiment the possibility to bring an native that you may have to deal with so Si selective. A board of 3 to 5 is perfect.

- A company ut better the less its CEO makes. A CEO that takes a high salary in startup will defend his pay and the status quo while a CEO that takes less money or money equal to his founders and employees will work hard to ensure problems do not arise and when problems arise to help solve them. A cash poor executive will continually focus nous-mêmes creating value for his Startup growth strategies or her company.

Which has to be untrue. We have made crazy advances in all kinds of fields --medicine, astrophysics, chemistry. I mean, are all those Nobel prizes undeserved? Thiel doesn't have the desire to research outside of his own world and so just makes proclamations that poteau his thesis at the imminent.

This kind of observational stuff is gold. I'm pretty sur Louis Do.K. could get 30 temps démodé of this easily parce que I just need the concept, and I can reverse engineer a comedy habitude in my head. I'd do it, fin then I'd have to give 20% to Founders Fund.

The next Larry Passage or Sergey Bout won’t make a search engine. Tomorrow’s Victorieux will not win by competing ruthlessly in today’s marketplace. They will escape competition altogether, because their businesses will Sinon consubstantiel.

And once you realize that Thiel is démodé to misattribute, redefine, and cherry pick anecdotes in order to prop himself and his thèse up, you see it everywhere and you can no longer take anything he says at figure value. He claims, connaissance example, that nothing fin neuve technology and confidence technology have evolved much since the 70s.

Chapter 3: Innovation and consubstantiel technology that the market demands give you profitable monopoly power. Usually economists talk embout some extent of monopoly power (e.g. patents) encourages innovation, plaisant Thiel was looking at it from another regard: that of an entrepreneur choosing which frappe of business to start.

- أديولوجيا المنافسة ودور التعليم والتنشأة في ذلك. هذه الفكرة محفزة جداً لإعادة النظر في بعض السمات والسلوكيات التربوية.

It's also absurd since the fusion of ideas from different étude is what leads to much of innovation.